MAPP Network

An online forum for MAPP communities

My community is starting to design a third iteration to begin in 2016, and some partners are expressing that every 3 years is too frequent to conduct a. broad assessment and make meaningful change happen in the action cycle. We are a small rural community in AK, and like everywhere, resources are tightening. For some, using collective impact as we have since the second iteration, and staying with that one selected focus area, family well-being, makes more sense. I am not sure we want to give up a broad focus for data collection, so I am wondering what other communities have discussed and how they proceeded. I do see that our workgroup focus could be lost if we launch too broadly, yet I am not sure looking only narrowly is the answer...

Views: 34

Reply to This

© 2017   Created by MAPP.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service